Provisional
edition
United Nations reform and the Council of Europe member
states
Resolution 1688 (2009)1
1. The
United Nations was established 64 years ago in order to “save
succeeding generations from the scourge of war”. Born on the
ashes of a global catastrophe, the United Nations has
succeeded in preventing a catastrophe of such dimensions
occurring again. In addition, credit should be given to the
United Nations for its role in reducing the number and the
death toll of conflicts worldwide, especially since the end of
the Cold War.
2. The
Parliamentary Assembly considers the United Nations to be the
cornerstone for preventing breaches of peace, achieving the
resolution of conflicts and building peace and confidence in
post-conflict situations. It continues to give the United
Nations and multilateralism its unabated support, as already
stated in its
Recommendations 1367 (1998) on Reform of the United
Nations, 1476 (2000) on the United Nations at the turn of
the new century, and its
Resolution 1373 (2004) on Strengthening of the
United Nations.
3.
Notwithstanding its considerable achievements in preserving
peace and international security, the United Nations is in
urgent need of a far-reaching reform in order to make it more
transparent, accountable and capable of facing the global
challenges of today’s world.
4. The
Assembly notes the numerous reform proposals that have been
advanced over the last years and pays tribute to former United
Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan for his efforts to
promote a comprehensive reform of the Organisation.
5. The
Assembly, however, regrets that, so far, there has been no
reform proposal aimed at improving the democratic character of
the United Nations. In this context, the Assembly recalls its
well-established position in support of the introduction of a
parliamentary dimension of the United Nations, as set forth in
its Resolution 1476 (2006) on the Parliamentary dimension of
the United Nations, in order to improve the transparency,
accountability and democratic oversight of the organisation
and bridge the gap between the United Nations and the
people.
6. The incorporation of a democratic element
in the United Nations system has become even more necessary as
a response to the process of globalisation: only global
governance can face up to its challenges, and such global
governance, embodied in the United Nations, must be based on
democratic principles.
7. As to institutional reform, the Assembly
reiterates its conviction that the role and the authority of
the United Nations General Assembly as “the chief
deliberative, policy-making and representative organ of the
United Nations” should be restored. This role could be further
strengthened by the introduction, or the reinforcement, of a
parliamentary element in the structure of the UN General
Assembly, composed either by representatives of international
regional parliamentary assemblies or directly elected
representatives.
8. As regards the reform of the United
Nations Security Council, which has proved to be the most
elusive aspect of the reform effort, the Assembly expresses
its support for the idea of a transitional reform of the
United Nations Security Council as a way of overcoming the
long-lasting deadlock, as proposed by France and the United
Kingdom, while welcoming the new impetus in the negotiation
process which started in February 2009.
9. Concerned to ensure that the protection of
human rights worldwide takes precedence over other
considerations, the Assembly believes that any reform of the
United Nations Security Council should be such as to enable
this body to act swiftly in the case of actual or threatened
serious and widespread human rights violations and that its
action should not be impeded by the exercise of the right to
veto by the permanent members of the Security Council.
10. In addition, the Assembly encourages the
holding of negotiations over a reform of the Security
Council’s working methods outside the framework of the
negotiation of a comprehensive reform package. The aim of this
reform should be to improve the transparency of the work of
the Security Council and make it possible for states which are
not members of it to have easier access to it and express
their concerns when they feel that their interests are at
stake.
11. In the light of the above, the Assembly
recommends to Council of Europe member states to reach a
common position as regards:
11.1. a
transitional reform of the Security Council, based on the
establishment of a new category of non-permanent seats,
which could be held for a longer period of time than in the
current system;
11.2.
the prohibition of the recourse to the veto in the case of
actual or threatened serious and widespread human rights
violations;
11.3. a
free-standing reform of the working methods of the Security
Council, outside the framework of the broader reform
process;
11.4.
ways to restore the role and the authority of the General
Assembly, including by introducing or reinforcing a
parliamentary dimension;
11.5.
ways to improve the interaction between the Security Council
and the General Assembly.
12. The
Assembly also invites the governments of Council of Europe
member states to co-operate in order to draw up an inventory
of all their different reform groups and proposals.
1 Assembly debate on 1 October
2009 (33rd Sitting) (see Doc.
12018, report of the Political Affairs Committee,
rapporteur: Mr Gross). Text adopted by the Assembly on
1 October 2009 (33rd Sitting). |