Provisional
edition
National sovereignty and statehood in contemporary
international law: the need for clarification
Resolution 1832 (2011)1
1. The
Parliamentary Assembly observes that a number of territorial
entities in Council of Europe member states are aspiring to be
recognised as independent states.
2. It
notes that the criteria for statehood remain a contentious
issue in contemporary international law.
3. The
lack of clear criteria for statehood and for lawful secession
on the one hand, and violations of minority and human rights,
lack of democracy and participation on the other hand, has
encouraged the emergence of numerous secessionist movements
and thereby threatens peace, stability and the territorial
integrity of existing states, also in Europe.
4. The
Assembly notes that the notions of national sovereignty and
statehood have evolved in recent years. Key developments were
summed up in 2001 by a high-level International Commission on
Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS) under the aegis of
the United Nations and supported by Canada; its findings were
subsequently taken up by the United Nations General Assembly.
5. A
multilateral approach to the “responsibility to protect”, as
advocated by the ICISS, is taking the place of arbitrary
unilateral interventions and bilateral guarantees:
5.1.
Military interventions such as those by Turkey in Cyprus in
1974, by the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) in the
Federal Republic of Yugoslavia in 1999 and by the Russian
Federation in Georgia in 2008, whilst motivated – justifiably
or not – by the need to stop serious human rights violations,
have themselves led to numerous human rights violations and
have not produced lasting solutions for the underlying
problems;
5.2.
Bilateral guarantees such as those in the context of the
independence of Cyprus have not prevented conflicts. On the
contrary, in the case of Cyprus they were used as an excuse
for unilateral military intervention, conflicting with Article
2 (4) of the Charter of the United Nations and a peremptory
norm of international law prohibiting the use of force.
6.
European integration and co-operation have led to a voluntary
transfer of certain aspects of national sovereignty, in
particular:
6.1.
The rights and freedoms of individuals are protected by
the supervisory mechanism of the European Convention of
Human Rights (ETS No. 5); states parties to the Convention
have accepted the duty to implement the judgments of the
European Court of Human Rights, with considerations of
national sovereignty being of secondary importance;
6.2.
European integration, in particular the introduction of
the euro, the official currency of the Eurozone, has
entailed the transfer to the European Union of a number of
sectors which were traditionally under national
sovereignty, particularly in matters of economic and
monetary policies, and is increasingly affecting choices
of fiscal and social policies. Increasing economic
integration has similar effects even on countries which
are not members of the eurozone or the European
Union.
7. The
Assembly considers that even if international law were to
recognise a right of national or ethnic minorities or even, in
some cases, national majorities to self-determination, such a
right would not give rise to an automatic right to secession.
The right to self-determination should first and foremost be
implemented by way of the protection of minority rights as
foreseen in the Council of Europe Framework Convention for the
Protection of National Minorities (ETS No. 157) and
Assembly
Resolution 1334 (2003) on positive experiences of
autonomous regions as a source of inspiration for conflict
resolution in Europe, as well as in other relevant instruments
of international law.
8. The
Assembly therefore:
8.1.
reiterates its invitation to those member states which
have not yet done so to sign, ratify and implement the
Framework Convention and to respect the basic principles
set out in Assembly
Resolution 1334 (2003) as soon as possible;
8.2.
will continue to analyse the origin and trends of
self-determination movements by addressing the most
salient factors, in particular instances of growing
tensions among minority or ethnic groups, and to support
national parliaments in addressing these demands for
self-determination through dialogue and reconciliation, in
order to prevent recourse to violence and
secession;
8.3.
invites all member states to refrain from recognising or
supporting in any way the de facto authorities of
territories resulting from unlawful secessions, in
particular those supported by foreign military
interventions;
8.4.
notes that conflicts should be solved exclusively by
peaceful means on the basis of international law;
8.5.
proposes that the criteria for statehood, including those
for the emergence of new states by legal secession, and the
modalities of protection of national sovereignty and
territorial integrity of states be examined thoroughly in
the framework of a follow-up conference to the International
Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty.
1 Assembly debate on 4 October
2011 (31st Sitting) (see Doc.
12689, report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and Human
Rights, rapporteur: Ms Schuster). Text adopted by the
Assembly on 4 October 2011 (31st Sitting). |