|
|
Provisional
edition
The impact of the Lisbon Treaty on the Council of
Europe
Resolution 1836 (2011)1
1. The
Parliamentary Assembly welcomes the fact that, with the entry
into force of the Lisbon Treaty, on 1 December 2009, the
values on which the Council of Europe is based and which are
commonly shared with the European Union, namely respect for
human rights, democracy and the rule of law, are put to the
forefront of EU policies. The Treaty aims to bring Europe
closer to its people and create an open and secure space for
all and, for this purpose, has in particular:
1.1.
provided an obligation for the European Union to accede to
the European Convention on Human Rights (ETS No. 5, “the
Convention”); allowed for EU accession to other
international human rights legal instruments, such as the
United Nations Convention on Persons with Disabilities
which the European Union joined already in 2010; given the
European Union a legally binding bill of rights of its
own, namely the Charter of Fundamental Rights;
1.2.
introduced the European Citizens’ Initiative; extended the
mandate of the European Ombudsman; substantially
strengthened the role and powers of the European
Parliament; enhanced the role of the national parliaments
in the EU decision-making process.
2. Having
acquired legal personality, the European Union has also
acquired a new status and voice within international and
regional organisations, including in the United Nations. The
Union’s role has, moreover, been increased in the traditional
areas of activity of the Council of Europe such as justice,
freedom and security. This has, inter alia, affected
the interaction between the European Union and its member
states when participating in Council of Europe steering
committees and when negotiating new Council of Europe
conventions on matters falling within these areas.
3. The
Assembly welcomes the fact that, in line with the Lisbon
Treaty, “The Stockholm Programme – An open and secure Europe
serving and protecting the citizen”, while emphasising the
need for evaluation of the implementation of Union policies in
these areas, provided that “duplication with other evaluation
mechanisms should be avoided, but synergies and co-operation
should be sought, in particular with the work of the Council
of Europe”.
4. The
Assembly therefore notes that the entry into force of the
Lisbon Treaty has opened up new opportunities for a reinforced
partnership between the Council of Europe and the European
Union, based on each other’s acquis and comparative
advantages. In the Assembly’s view, such a partnership should
aim to ensure coherence between, on the one hand, the
pan-European project promoted by the Council of Europe and, on
the other, the integration process initiated by the European
Union. It should ultimately lead to a common space for human
rights protection across the continent in the interest of all
people in Europe.
5. While
welcoming the steps already taken in the right direction, the
Assembly expects that the role of the Council of Europe as
“the benchmark for human rights, rule of law and democracy in
Europe” will be further enhanced, fully reaffirmed and
effectively recognised by all EU institutions. Building on the
2007 Memorandum of Understanding between the two
Organisations, the Lisbon Treaty and the perspectives opened
up by the ongoing reform of the Council of Europe, the
recently reinforced partnership between the two organisations
should be further consolidated and regular policy
co-ordination should be further developed at all levels.
6.
Referring to its previous resolutions and recommendations,
which for some 30 years have called for EU accession to the
European Convention on Human Rights, in particular
Resolution 1610 (2008) and
Recommendation 1834 (2008), the Assembly:
6.1.
reiterates that accession will not only offer a unique
opportunity to achieve a coherent system of human rights
protection across Europe, but also afford its people
protection against the Union’s action similar to the one
they already enjoy against action by all its member
states, in particular now that the Lisbon Treaty has led
to a substantial transfer of powers from the EU member
states to the Union;
6.2.
welcomes the Resolution of the European Parliament of 19
May 2010 on the institutional aspects of the accession of
the European Union to the European Convention on Human
Rights, which advocated European Union accession to the
Convention as “an essential first step”, to be completed
by EU accession to other Council of Europe
conventions;
6.3.
notes with satisfaction that, at expert level, informal
negotiations on an Agreement on Accession of the European
Union to the European Convention on Human Rights, opened
in July 2010, were conducted smoothly and led to the
elaboration of a Draft Accession Agreement at the end of
June 2011; they were facilitated by a Joint Communication,
issued in January 2011, by the Presidents of the European
Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the
European Union;
6.4.
welcomes the constructive spirit in which its
representatives and those of the European Parliament
reached agreement within a Joint Informal Body, in June
2011, on arrangements related to the participation of
European Parliament representatives in the sittings of the
Assembly and its relevant bodies when the latter exercise
their functions related to the election of judges to the
European Court of Human Rights; these will have to be
approved by the Assembly and the European Parliament in
due course;
6.5.
welcomes the fact that representatives of civil society
have been consulted throughout the informal accession
negotiations and invites them to ensure public awareness
and actively promote European Union accession to the
European Convention on Human Rights in their dealings with
national parliaments and governments, as well as with
European Union institutions.
7. In
order to complete the process, there is now a need for the
active support of all European governments and parliaments,
which will have to renew the political commitment they
undertook when ratifying the Lisbon Treaty and/or Protocol No.
14 to the European Convention on Human Rights. Therefore, the
Assembly urges the parliaments and governments of member
states of the Council of Europe, as well as all European Union
institutions, to:
7.1.
take all measures within their areas of competence to
enable rapid conclusion of the Agreement on the Accession
of the European Union to the Convention, its endorsement
and its entry into force, guided by the principle that
such accession aims to increase human rights protection;
7.2.
ensure that accession modalities be kept as simple as
possible and that the Convention system be preserved as it
stands with a minimum of adjustments necessary to take
into account the specificities of the European Union as a
non-state party with a particular legal and institutional
system;
7.3.
ensure that civil society will be consulted also in the
context of negotiation of the relevant European Union
internal rules;
7.4.
raise awareness among people about the enhanced protection
of their rights following European Union accession to the
Convention and relevant procedures.
8. With a
view to further pursuing the building of a common space for
human rights protection at pan-European level and ensuring
coherence of standards and also of monitoring of their
implementation in areas falling within the remit of both
organisations, thus avoiding duplication and monitoring
fatigue, in particular at a time of economic crisis, the
Assembly invites the European Union to:
8.1.
accede to key Council of Europe conventions tackling major
challenges of today’s European society, such as: the
Convention on the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or
Degrading Treatment or Punishment (ETS No. 126); the
Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings (CETS
No. 197); the Convention on the Protection of Children
against Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse (CETS No. 201);
the Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against
Women and Domestic Violence (CETS No. 210); the Convention for
the Protection of Individuals with Regard to Automatic
Processing of Personal Data (ETS No. 108); the Convention on
the Prevention of Terrorism (CETS No. 196); the Criminal Law
Convention on Corruption (ETS No. 173); the Civil Law
Convention on Corruption (ETS No. 174); the Convention on
Cybercrime (ETS No. 185), the Convention on Access to Official
Documents (CETS No. 205), the Convention on Human Rights and
Biomedicine (CETS No. 164), the Anti-Doping Convention (ETS
No. 135), as well as to the revised European Social Charter
(ETS No. 163);
8.2.
join Council of Europe monitoring mechanisms and bodies,
irrespective of whether or not they are convention-based,
such as the Group of States against Corruption (GRECO),
the Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or
Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT), the Group of
Experts on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings
(GRETA), the European Commission against Racism and
Intolerance (ECRI), the European Commission for the
Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ) or the European Commission
for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission) and, pending
that, enhance its participation in their work;
8.3.
co-ordinate action with the Council of Europe in the areas
of trafficking in human beings, violence against women,
migration and asylum and ensure appropriate follow-up to the
high level conference on Roma issues organised by the
Council of Europe in October 2010;
8.4.
promote accession to key Council of Europe conventions and
monitoring mechanisms and bodies among its member states
and in the context of its enlargement and neighbourhood
policies, as appropriate;
8.5.
ensure systematic and open consultations with the relevant
bodies of the Council of Europe, throughout the European
Union legislative process, in particular in the areas of
freedom, security and justice, so as to allow for an
adequate assessment of European Union activities against
the human rights benchmarks set by the Council of
Europe;
8.6.
enhance consultations with the Council of Europe
Commissioner for Human Rights, especially as regards the
implementation of human rights standards by European Union
member states.
9.
Moreover, the Assembly:
9.1.
calls for coherence of the normative activities within the
two organisations, which should be ensured in particular
through prior consultations at an early a stage as
possible and at high political level, in addition to
inter-secretariat information sharing at operational
level;
9.2.
notes with interest the manner in which the European Court
of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European
Union ensure coherence in their case law with respect to
human rights standards;
9.3.
urges the creation of appropriate synergies between
Council of Europe monitoring mechanisms and any new
evaluation mechanisms to be set up by the European
Union;
9.4.
welcomes the fact that, pending full European Union
accession to GRECO and evaluation of European Union
institutions by the latter, negotiations will soon start
on an enhanced European Union participation in GRECO which
should allow for synergies to be developed with the
proposed European Union Anti-Corruption report;
negotiations should soon start also on European Union
accession to the Council of Europe data protection
convention, and European Union accession to the cybercrime
convention is also being considered;
9.5.
supports the ongoing convention review within the Council
of Europe, which should identify ways of facilitating
European Union accession to key Council of Europe
conventions, while ensuring that each convention system is
preserved as it stands with only minor adjustments;
9.6.
notes that arrangements agreed in the context of European
Union accession to the European Convention on Human Rights
regarding the participation of the European Union and its
voting rights within the Council of Europe Committee of
Ministers might serve as a precedent for future European
Union accession to other Council of Europe conventions;
9.7.
invites the Secretary General of the Council of Europe to
present a list of concrete implications and advantages of
European Union accession to relevant Council of Europe
conventions or monitoring mechanisms, as well as partial
agreements, thus helping the European Union to form a
long-term vision on synergies with the Council of Europe,
building also on the position already taken in this
respect by the European Parliament.
10. The
Assembly further notes that the Lisbon Treaty has put emphasis
on issues related to human rights, the rule of law and
democracy in the Union’s co-operation with neighbouring
countries, thus allowing for enhanced co-operation with the
Council of Europe also in this respect. Recent events
throughout the Southern Mediterranean have created new
opportunities for co-operation in the context of a revised
European Union European Neighbourhood Policy and a new Council
of Europe policy towards neighbouring regions, of which an
important element is the Partnership for Democracy status
created by the Assembly for parliaments in these regions. The
Assembly therefore calls on the European Union to:
10.1.
make better use of the Council of Europe’s benchmarking
and advisory role and expertise in the context of its
enlargement and neighbourhood policies, in particular to
the extent that these policies apply to countries which
are either full Council of Europe member states, and thus
benefit from the Organisation’s monitoring procedures, or
belong to its neighbourhood and have thus joined or may
join open Council of Europe conventions or partial
agreements, such as the Venice Commission and the European
Centre for Global Interdependence and Solidarity
(North-South Centre), and whose parliaments have been or
may be granted Partnership for Democracy status with the
Assembly;
10.2.
further develop joint actions and joint programmes with
the Council of Europe in the latter’s member states or in
countries in its neighbouring regions, with a view to
supporting the reform agenda in these countries, including
through a more stable financial partnership with the
Council of Europe, which would allow for increased
strategic co-operation and joint long-term
planning.
11. As
regards relations between the European Ombudsman and the
Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, the Assembly
welcomes their ongoing informal co-operation, including for
the purpose of co-ordinating activities among European
Ombudspersons, and calls for this co-operation to be further
developed on all matters related to individuals’ rights.
12.
Welcoming the informal contacts established between the
Council of Europe and the European Data Protection Supervisor
of the European Union, the Assembly invites the Council of
Europe’s Data Protection Commissioner and the European Data
Protection Supervisor to reinforce their mutual
co-operation.
13. For
its part, the Assembly welcomes improved co-operation with the
European Parliament following the entry into force of the
Lisbon Treaty, under which the latter has become
co-legislator, together with the European Union Council, in a
number of key policy areas falling within the Council of
Europe’s remit, including those relating to freedom, security
and justice. Building on the Agreement on the strengthening of
co-operation between the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council
of Europe and the European Parliament of 28 November 2007, the
Assembly resolves to further enhance its relations with the
European Parliament, in particular by:
13.1.
reinforcing the practice of regular meetings between, on
the one hand, the respective Presidents and, on the other
hand, between its Presidential Committee and the
Conference of Presidents of the European Parliament on an
agenda-driven basis;
13.2.
pursuing the work of their Joint Informal Body, created
upon the initiative of the European Parliament to improve
information sharing between the two bodies and which
initially met within the context of European Union
accession to the European Convention on Human Rights, with
a view to discussing other topical issues of common
interest, in a variable composition, as appropriate;
13.3.
further pursuing exchanges of views, joint activities and
information exchange between members of the Assembly and
of the European Parliament at committee level, and
establishing regular meetings of chairpersons of relevant
committees from the two bodies;
13.4.
considering ways to contribute to the effective
strengthening of relations between the European Parliament
and the national parliaments of European Union member
states, as a body bringing together members of all these
parliaments;
13.5.
organising jointly with the European Parliament
inter-parliamentary conferences on specific topics of
common interest;
13.6.
enhancing co-operation in joint electoral observation
missions.
14. The
Assembly calls on the governments and parliaments of Council
of Europe member states, as well as the European Union, to
promote the visibility of the reinforced partnership between
the two Organisations, in the present post-Lisbon era and
raise public awareness about the need to further consolidate
such a partnership in the interest of all people in Europe. It
particularly calls upon parliaments of European Union member
states to do so through regular debates on issues related to
the relations between the two organisations, including those
between the Assembly and the European Parliament, as well as
through parliamentary questions to governments.
15. The
Assembly believes that the entry into force of the Lisbon
Treaty, with all its legal and political consequences and the
ensuing reshaping of the European architecture, gives fresh
topicality to the perspective of European Union accession to
the Council of Europe Statute and considers that the time is
now ripe to give serious consideration to this
perspective.
1 Assembly debate on 5 October
2011 (33rd Sitting) (see Doc.
12713, report of the Political Affairs Committee,
rapporteur: Ms Lundgren; Doc.
12743, opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs and Human
Rights, rapporteur: Mr Omtzigt; Doc.
12741, opinion of the Committee on Culture, Science and
Education, rapporteur: Mr Flego; and Doc.
12746, opinion of the Committee on Equal Opportunities for
Women and Men, rapporteur: Mr Mendes Bota). Text adopted by
the Assembly on 5 October 2011 (33rd Sitting).
See also
Recommendation 1982 (2011). |
|