Provisional
edition
Judicial corruption
Recommendation 1896 (2010)1
1. The
Parliamentary Assembly, recalling its
Resolution 1703 (2010) on judicial corruption, regards the
eradication of judicial corruption as a priority for the
action of the Council of Europe, in that it threatens the rule
of law, which is the backbone of a pluralistic democracy, and
favours impunity.
2. It
congratulates the Committees of Ministers for having issued
terms of reference to a Group of Specialists on the Judiciary
(CJ-S-JUD) to revise Committee of Ministers Recommendation No.
R (94) 12 on the independence, efficiency and role of judges,
focusing on national courts. It suggests that the group of
specialists take into account the conclusions of the
Assembly’s
Resolutions 1703 (2010) and 1685 (2009) respectively
concerning judicial corruption and allegations of politically
motivated abuses of the criminal justice system in Council of
Europe member states, and make explicit reference to the fight
against corruption of judges in the explanatory report to the
revised draft recommendation.
3. It
encourages the Consultative Committee of European Prosecutors
(CCPE) to persevere in its role as guardian of the due
application of Committee of Ministers Recommendation
Rec(2000)19 on the role of public prosecution in the criminal
justice system, bearing in mind especially the independence of
prosecutors and having regard to the reforms which have taken
place in the member states since the recommendation was
adopted. The Assembly encourages the CCPE to review this
recommendation in a similar way to the current revision of
Recommendation No. R (94) 12.
4. The
Assembly invites the Committee of Ministers to elaborate a
model code of conduct directed at judicial officials, along
the lines of the model code of conduct for public officials
appended to Committee of Ministers Recommendation No. R (2000)
10 on codes of conduct for public officials. In this context,
it would be expedient to refer to
Opinion No. 3 of the Consultative Council of European
Judges of Europe (CCJE) on the principles and rules governing
judges’ professional conduct, in particular ethics,
incompatible behaviour and impartiality.
5. Noting
that the Communication from the European Commission to the
European Parliament and the Council of the European Union of
10 June 2009 concerning the Stockholm Programme advocates
periodical evaluation of the efforts made by the European
Union and the member states to combat corruption, and
considering that such an initiative is liable to duplicate the
work of the Group of States against Corruption (GRECO), the
Assembly invites the Committee of Ministers to strive for
closer co-operation between GRECO and the relevant
institutions of the European Union, inter alia, through
European Union participation in GRECO, as foreseen by the
GRECO Statute, in order to guard against duplications and
promote synergies.
6. The
Assembly invites the Committee of Ministers to gather
figure-supported information on prosecutions and convictions
of judicial officials in the Council of Europe member states.
To guarantee its utility, a study of this kind should be
updated regularly.
7.
Lastly, the Assembly invites the Committee of Ministers to
give the European Charter on the Status of Judges wider
publicity; albeit of a purely declarative character, it should
be a de facto reference for the member states.
1 Assembly debate on 27 January
2010 (5th Sitting) (see Doc.
12058, report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and Human
Rights, rapporteur: Mr Sasi). Text adopted by the
Assembly on 27 January 2010 (5th Sitting). |